WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland should
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
-
Goljano Lion
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 15340
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:07 pm
WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland should
WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland should be considered London- A cable on Britain’s Africa policy, sent on 6 February 2009 by the political counsellor Richard Mills at the US embassy in London, suggested recognition of Somaliland should be considered to allow it access to international mechanisms for development and capacity support, as well as to support its democratic development in the face of increasing Islamic militant pressures.
The Full Document:
Friday, 06 February 2009, 16:25
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 LONDON 000339
NOFORN
SIPDIS
DEPART FOR AF/FO, AF/W, AF/E, AF/C, AF/S, AF/RSA, AF/SPG,
AND AF/EPS
EO 12958 DECL: 02/04/2019
TAGS PREL, EAID, MASS, KISL, ZI, SO, NI, SU, SF, XA, UK
SUBJECT: AFRICA: U.S. VERSUS UK PRIORITIES, LONDON THINK
TANKS COMMENT
REF: A. 08 LONDON 1426 B. 08 LONDON 2477 C. LONDON 289 D. LONDON 266 E. 08 LONDON 2882 F. 08 LONDON 3165 G. 08 LONDON 2917
Classified By: Political Counselor Richard Mills, reasons 1.4 (b/d).
1. (SBU/NF) Summary. During the transition to the Obama Administration, London think tanks have been active in discussing USG and HMG priorities in Africa. Poloff took the opportunity to poll opinions among Africa specialists at Chatham House, RUSI, the Royal Africa Society, Africa Confidential, the Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit, and International Crisis Group (please protect). The following are issue-by-issue consensus summaries from those discussions:
– HMG’s Africa policy lacks focus and is unable to internally prioritize its Africa policy.
– Zimbabwe should/will remain a priority for the UK for historical reasons, but the USG’s focus is “surprising,” as it is largely a contained crisis that should be treated as a regional issue. A “tough and quiet” approach should be considered.
– Somalia should be more of a priority for HMG, given the UK’s history with the region, the large number of Somali Diaspora in the UK, and the real security threats that community may present to the UK.
– Nigeria, especially the Niger Delta and corruption issues, should be a greater HMG priority because of Nigeria’s financial links to the UK, large UK-based Diaspora community, and energy potential.
– Sudan, including the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the Darfur crisis, should remain top USG and HMG priorities because of the regional impact destabilization would have on the Horn.
– South Africa’s desire for a permanent UNSC seat should be the leverage point for the USG and HMG to actively improve relations with South Africa.
– The global economic downturn will have a greater affect on Africa than the IMF and World Bank are predicting.
– Engaging African Diaspora communities should be a key USG and HMG focus, as Africa is the most politically globalized continent.
– Engaging Muslims in Africa may be a mechanism to also improve relations with the Middle East and South Asia. End summary.
UK Africa Policy Lacks Direction, Unable to Prioritize
——————————————— ———
2. (SBU/NF) Most London-based think tank Africa specialists thought HMG had lost its ability to prioritize on Africa, especially since the October 2008 departure of Prime Minister’s Special Advisor on Africa and Development Justin Forsyth. HMG’s creation of an inter-agency Defense-Foreign Office-International Development Cabinet Sub-Committee on Africa, they thought, had not succeeded in resolving internal HMG disputes over priorities in Africa. Given the UK’s credit crunch and diminishing international influence, the Chatham House Africa specialist asserted, HMG should be trying to burden share on Africa with the French and the EU. HMG, however, has not done that effectively and is therefore spreading itself too thin, resulting in a lack of tangible impact in areas of strategic British interest.
3. (C/NF) Embassy comment: Forsyth, while hit-or-miss on follow through, was generally able to corral UK government departments into setting African priorities: Sudan, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria. FCO Minister for Africa Mark Malloch-Brown has tried to provide direction (ref A), but his “nice guy” approach of dealing directly with African leaders through his well-established network of contacts, coupled with the lack-luster direction of the new FCO Africa Director Adam
LONDON 00000339 002 OF 003
Wood (ref B), has meant no serious consideration of the UK’s priorities in Africa. The UK’s National Security Strategy also failed to provide any direction, though efforts are underway to improve the document (ref C). Brendan Cox, former Crisis Action head, is due to replace Forsyth at No. 10 in mid-February, but many of those with whom we spoke questioned if he will have the political capital to make any real impact on the UK’s Africa policy, given Prime Minister Brown’s standing in the domestic polls and need to focus on the global economic situation. End comment.
Zimbabwe
——–
4. (SBU/NF) Several think tank analysts thought that Zimbabwe should and will remain a top priority for the UK, but that HMG’s history of bombastic statements has only served to solidify President Mugabe’s status as a colonial liberation leader and rallied South Africa’s unwavering support. From a strategic perspective, these analysts termed the USG’s focus on Zimbabwe as “surprising” because Zimbabwe is not a threat, but largely a contained crisis. They said that Zimbabwe’s crisis should be treated as a regional issue, not an international one, and that the USG should not sacrifice it’s relations with South Africa, the more strategic partner, over Zimbabwe, even if the political events in Zimbabwe run contrary to the USG’s democracy agenda. They recommended the international community take a “tough and quiet” approach to Mugabe and ZANU-PF, sanctioning and obstructing their personal freedoms but without commenting publicly. They asserted that the international community’s concern about Zimbabwe being a regional destabilizer is largely unfounded, as most of the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) – especially South Africa – “can take of themselves.”
Somalia
——-
5. (SBU/NF) Given the UK’s history, the large number of Somali Diaspora in the UK, and the real security threats that community may present to the UK, think tank security specialists thought Somalia should be more of a priority for HMG. HMG, they argued, should be more innovative on Somalia policy, focusing on local community engagement and finding humanitarian and social initiatives where material benefit can be derived without deployment of an excessively large peacekeeping force. The RUSI Africa specialist said HMG and the USG’s previous entry point to Somalia was through Ethiopia. With the withdrawal of Ethiopian troops, a new entry point should be found quickly. He thought both IGAD and the AU could serve in this capacity. He also asserted that recognition of Somaliland should be considered to allow it access to international mechanisms for development and capacity support, as well as to support its democratic development in the face of increasing Islamic militant pressures.
6. (C/NF) Embassy comment. Cabinet office officials have told us that they consider Somalia a serious security concern, but they have not been able to induce other HMG departments to move on it, in large part because of the failure of the HMG process to set Africa priorities. HMG’s budget crunch also seems to be hindering the decision-making process (ref D). End comment.
Nigeria
——-
7. (SBU/NF) Think tank West Africa specialists, citing Nigeria’s significant financial links to the UK, large Diaspora community, and energy potential, said that the country, especially the Niger Delta and corruption issues, should be a clear HMG priority, but it has not been. HMG’s capacity for political analysis on Nigeria, they thought, was both “weak and shallow.” The RUSI security specialist said Nigeria, as well as Africa as a whole, needs better maritime security and should be able to secure its ports. Weak land and maritime security, combined with fragile state and government institutions, is an integrated problem in Nigeria, he asserted.
8. (C/NF) Embassy comment: Although the Foreign Office appears interested in developing a more focused and strategic policy on Nigeria, the Home Office’s drive to conclude a
LONDON 00000339 003 OF 003
prisoner transfer agreement has prevented HMG from moving forward on any other meaningful issues (refs E, F, and G). End comment.
Sudan
—–
9. (SBU/NF) All the think tank analysts consulted agreed that Sudan, including implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and finding a political solution to the Darfur crisis, should remain top HMG and USG priorities because of the regional impact destabilization of Sudan would have on the entire Horn of Africa.
South Africa
————
10. (SBU/NF) These analysts also all agreed that now was the time for both HMG and the USG to improve relations with South Africa. It is time to mend fences, especially for the UK, and South Africa’s desire for a permanent UN Security Council seat as part of UNSC reform, should be the leverage point, they asserted. South Africa, they assessed, has the potential to break up unhelpful African voting blocks in the UN, in spite of its “diplomatically difficult” time during its recent rotation on the Security Council.
The Global Economic Downturn and Africa
—————————————
11. (SBU/NF) Royal African Society specialists thought the global economic downturn would affect Africa significantly, much more than the IMF and World Bank have been reporting, because of falling commodity prices. Increased unemployment, they thought, would likely increase urban unrest and destabilize individual nations’ security.
Engaging the Diaspora
———————
12. (SBU/NF) Several think tank specialists noted the importance of the African Diaspora. With the global credit crunch, they thought, the African Diaspora’s role will be increasingly important, both economically and politically. They asserted that Africa is the most politically globalized continent, even if it is not economically globalized. They indicated that HMG and the USG should find ways for the Diaspora to constructively engage on the continent, which will influence African governments in favor of Western values, as most large, affluent African Diaspora communities are based in the West.
Islam
—–
13. (SBU/NF) The RUSI Africa specialist suggested that HMG and the USG should do more to engage Muslims in Africa, as it is an easier entry point for fostering goodwill that may transmit to more difficult geographic areas, like the Middle East and South Asia.
Visit London’s Classified Website: http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Unit ed_Kingdom
The Full Document:
Friday, 06 February 2009, 16:25
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 LONDON 000339
NOFORN
SIPDIS
DEPART FOR AF/FO, AF/W, AF/E, AF/C, AF/S, AF/RSA, AF/SPG,
AND AF/EPS
EO 12958 DECL: 02/04/2019
TAGS PREL, EAID, MASS, KISL, ZI, SO, NI, SU, SF, XA, UK
SUBJECT: AFRICA: U.S. VERSUS UK PRIORITIES, LONDON THINK
TANKS COMMENT
REF: A. 08 LONDON 1426 B. 08 LONDON 2477 C. LONDON 289 D. LONDON 266 E. 08 LONDON 2882 F. 08 LONDON 3165 G. 08 LONDON 2917
Classified By: Political Counselor Richard Mills, reasons 1.4 (b/d).
1. (SBU/NF) Summary. During the transition to the Obama Administration, London think tanks have been active in discussing USG and HMG priorities in Africa. Poloff took the opportunity to poll opinions among Africa specialists at Chatham House, RUSI, the Royal Africa Society, Africa Confidential, the Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit, and International Crisis Group (please protect). The following are issue-by-issue consensus summaries from those discussions:
– HMG’s Africa policy lacks focus and is unable to internally prioritize its Africa policy.
– Zimbabwe should/will remain a priority for the UK for historical reasons, but the USG’s focus is “surprising,” as it is largely a contained crisis that should be treated as a regional issue. A “tough and quiet” approach should be considered.
– Somalia should be more of a priority for HMG, given the UK’s history with the region, the large number of Somali Diaspora in the UK, and the real security threats that community may present to the UK.
– Nigeria, especially the Niger Delta and corruption issues, should be a greater HMG priority because of Nigeria’s financial links to the UK, large UK-based Diaspora community, and energy potential.
– Sudan, including the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the Darfur crisis, should remain top USG and HMG priorities because of the regional impact destabilization would have on the Horn.
– South Africa’s desire for a permanent UNSC seat should be the leverage point for the USG and HMG to actively improve relations with South Africa.
– The global economic downturn will have a greater affect on Africa than the IMF and World Bank are predicting.
– Engaging African Diaspora communities should be a key USG and HMG focus, as Africa is the most politically globalized continent.
– Engaging Muslims in Africa may be a mechanism to also improve relations with the Middle East and South Asia. End summary.
UK Africa Policy Lacks Direction, Unable to Prioritize
——————————————— ———
2. (SBU/NF) Most London-based think tank Africa specialists thought HMG had lost its ability to prioritize on Africa, especially since the October 2008 departure of Prime Minister’s Special Advisor on Africa and Development Justin Forsyth. HMG’s creation of an inter-agency Defense-Foreign Office-International Development Cabinet Sub-Committee on Africa, they thought, had not succeeded in resolving internal HMG disputes over priorities in Africa. Given the UK’s credit crunch and diminishing international influence, the Chatham House Africa specialist asserted, HMG should be trying to burden share on Africa with the French and the EU. HMG, however, has not done that effectively and is therefore spreading itself too thin, resulting in a lack of tangible impact in areas of strategic British interest.
3. (C/NF) Embassy comment: Forsyth, while hit-or-miss on follow through, was generally able to corral UK government departments into setting African priorities: Sudan, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria. FCO Minister for Africa Mark Malloch-Brown has tried to provide direction (ref A), but his “nice guy” approach of dealing directly with African leaders through his well-established network of contacts, coupled with the lack-luster direction of the new FCO Africa Director Adam
LONDON 00000339 002 OF 003
Wood (ref B), has meant no serious consideration of the UK’s priorities in Africa. The UK’s National Security Strategy also failed to provide any direction, though efforts are underway to improve the document (ref C). Brendan Cox, former Crisis Action head, is due to replace Forsyth at No. 10 in mid-February, but many of those with whom we spoke questioned if he will have the political capital to make any real impact on the UK’s Africa policy, given Prime Minister Brown’s standing in the domestic polls and need to focus on the global economic situation. End comment.
Zimbabwe
——–
4. (SBU/NF) Several think tank analysts thought that Zimbabwe should and will remain a top priority for the UK, but that HMG’s history of bombastic statements has only served to solidify President Mugabe’s status as a colonial liberation leader and rallied South Africa’s unwavering support. From a strategic perspective, these analysts termed the USG’s focus on Zimbabwe as “surprising” because Zimbabwe is not a threat, but largely a contained crisis. They said that Zimbabwe’s crisis should be treated as a regional issue, not an international one, and that the USG should not sacrifice it’s relations with South Africa, the more strategic partner, over Zimbabwe, even if the political events in Zimbabwe run contrary to the USG’s democracy agenda. They recommended the international community take a “tough and quiet” approach to Mugabe and ZANU-PF, sanctioning and obstructing their personal freedoms but without commenting publicly. They asserted that the international community’s concern about Zimbabwe being a regional destabilizer is largely unfounded, as most of the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) – especially South Africa – “can take of themselves.”
Somalia
——-
5. (SBU/NF) Given the UK’s history, the large number of Somali Diaspora in the UK, and the real security threats that community may present to the UK, think tank security specialists thought Somalia should be more of a priority for HMG. HMG, they argued, should be more innovative on Somalia policy, focusing on local community engagement and finding humanitarian and social initiatives where material benefit can be derived without deployment of an excessively large peacekeeping force. The RUSI Africa specialist said HMG and the USG’s previous entry point to Somalia was through Ethiopia. With the withdrawal of Ethiopian troops, a new entry point should be found quickly. He thought both IGAD and the AU could serve in this capacity. He also asserted that recognition of Somaliland should be considered to allow it access to international mechanisms for development and capacity support, as well as to support its democratic development in the face of increasing Islamic militant pressures.
6. (C/NF) Embassy comment. Cabinet office officials have told us that they consider Somalia a serious security concern, but they have not been able to induce other HMG departments to move on it, in large part because of the failure of the HMG process to set Africa priorities. HMG’s budget crunch also seems to be hindering the decision-making process (ref D). End comment.
Nigeria
——-
7. (SBU/NF) Think tank West Africa specialists, citing Nigeria’s significant financial links to the UK, large Diaspora community, and energy potential, said that the country, especially the Niger Delta and corruption issues, should be a clear HMG priority, but it has not been. HMG’s capacity for political analysis on Nigeria, they thought, was both “weak and shallow.” The RUSI security specialist said Nigeria, as well as Africa as a whole, needs better maritime security and should be able to secure its ports. Weak land and maritime security, combined with fragile state and government institutions, is an integrated problem in Nigeria, he asserted.
8. (C/NF) Embassy comment: Although the Foreign Office appears interested in developing a more focused and strategic policy on Nigeria, the Home Office’s drive to conclude a
LONDON 00000339 003 OF 003
prisoner transfer agreement has prevented HMG from moving forward on any other meaningful issues (refs E, F, and G). End comment.
Sudan
—–
9. (SBU/NF) All the think tank analysts consulted agreed that Sudan, including implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and finding a political solution to the Darfur crisis, should remain top HMG and USG priorities because of the regional impact destabilization of Sudan would have on the entire Horn of Africa.
South Africa
————
10. (SBU/NF) These analysts also all agreed that now was the time for both HMG and the USG to improve relations with South Africa. It is time to mend fences, especially for the UK, and South Africa’s desire for a permanent UN Security Council seat as part of UNSC reform, should be the leverage point, they asserted. South Africa, they assessed, has the potential to break up unhelpful African voting blocks in the UN, in spite of its “diplomatically difficult” time during its recent rotation on the Security Council.
The Global Economic Downturn and Africa
—————————————
11. (SBU/NF) Royal African Society specialists thought the global economic downturn would affect Africa significantly, much more than the IMF and World Bank have been reporting, because of falling commodity prices. Increased unemployment, they thought, would likely increase urban unrest and destabilize individual nations’ security.
Engaging the Diaspora
———————
12. (SBU/NF) Several think tank specialists noted the importance of the African Diaspora. With the global credit crunch, they thought, the African Diaspora’s role will be increasingly important, both economically and politically. They asserted that Africa is the most politically globalized continent, even if it is not economically globalized. They indicated that HMG and the USG should find ways for the Diaspora to constructively engage on the continent, which will influence African governments in favor of Western values, as most large, affluent African Diaspora communities are based in the West.
Islam
—–
13. (SBU/NF) The RUSI Africa specialist suggested that HMG and the USG should do more to engage Muslims in Africa, as it is an easier entry point for fostering goodwill that may transmit to more difficult geographic areas, like the Middle East and South Asia.
Visit London’s Classified Website: http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Unit ed_Kingdom
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
You latch on to this as it were a spec of light in a dark cave. America won't recognize Sillyland unless there is a substantial stragetic interest warranting such a move. Giving Sillyland access to charity money, unfortunately for you, doesn't meet the criteria.
-
Goljano Lion
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 15340
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:07 pm
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
dont blame me, blame wiki-leak am just reporting what they saidunion wrote:You latch on to this as it were a spec of light in a dark cave. America won't recognize Sillyland unless there is a substantial stragetic interest warranting such a move. Giving Sillyland access to charity money, unfortunately for you, doesn't meet the criteria.
merry christmas and happy new year
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
Why don't you take your piss and choke on it. You claim to want to separate and having nothing to do with us, but yet an iddor can't open his mouth and make a single solitary sentence without bringing up the topic of sillyland. Nobody gives two hoots. You've said recognition is around the corner since '91. But yet it still isn't here. Guess what? It's not bloody comin'. 
-
Goljano Lion
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 15340
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:07 pm
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
for the love of Konfurians, just stop the killing and value human lives atleast, nigga that place is worst than the killing fields of cambodia jesus jeberti, human life is even less than a puppy dog......waa dilka joojiya horta balunion wrote:Why don't you take your piss and choke on it. You claim to want to separate and having nothing to do with us, but yet an iddor can't open his mouth and make a single solitary sentence without bringing up the topic of sillyland. Nobody gives two hoots. You've said recognition is around the corner since '91. But yet it still isn't here. Guess what? It's not bloody comin'.
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
This idiot doesn't understand it is the view of one thinktank expert and that is what the cable states. We know several others who have similar views but what you are missing is the view of British thinktank with dubious interest won't change the status quo. 
Last edited by udun on Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:43 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
Walaashiis
- SomaliNetizen

- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:03 pm
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
The British would have separated Somalia long time ago if they could have
They bloody are responsible of this mess of Somaliland maps
Viva Somalia
They bloody are responsible of this mess of Somaliland maps
Viva Somalia
- RuralMan08
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 4512
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:45 am
- Location: His Royal Majesty
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
It's not in the interests of the United States nor Europe to recognise Somaliland. Professor Ahmed Ismail Samatar has a monthly Pentagon meeting with top US officials and the United States have taken his approach that Hargeisa should be capital of Somalia and not a seperate state.
- The_Emperior5
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 50031
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:45 pm
- Location: Suldaanka Guud beelaha reer Sheikh isxaaq Bani Axmed Bani Hashiim. In the republic of Soliziland
- Contact:
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
RuralMan08 wrote:It's not in the interests of the United States nor Europe to recognise Somaliland. Professor Ahmed Ismail Samatar has a monthly Pentagon meeting with top US officials and the United States have taken his approach that Hargeisa should be capital of Somalia and not a seperate state.
Well thats the idea of Ina ismacil samatar even if he tries to sell that to the top united state officials , it's still far from the reality , Somalilands government is not something the United states created Like the TFG,, or something like that , its something we have created ourselves. The US and the western world does not really care if Somaliland is recognized or not if it's recognized by the african union they will recognize it.
- RuralMan08
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 4512
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:45 am
- Location: His Royal Majesty
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
Somaliland has a historical case for independence, they were seperate from Konfuur colonially speaking, Somalis were also never united in their history but the United States is today thinking what benefit is Somalia for the U.S? If they become independent then the South will be in chaos. The way they are thinking is that if democracy can be promoted like the way in Somaliland, then maybe this can influence the southern regions.The_Emperior5 wrote:
Well thats the idea of Ina ismacil samatar even if he tries to sell that to the top united state officials , it's still far from the reality , Somalilands government is not something the United states created Like the TFG,, or something like that , its something we have created ourselves. The US and the western world does not really care if Somaliland is recognized or not if it's recognized by the african union they will recognize it.
- The_Emperior5
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 50031
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:45 pm
- Location: Suldaanka Guud beelaha reer Sheikh isxaaq Bani Axmed Bani Hashiim. In the republic of Soliziland
- Contact:
Re: WikiLeaks:US embassy cables-Recognition of Somaliland sh
RuralMan08 wrote:Somaliland has a historical case for independence, they were seperate from Konfuur colonially speaking, Somalis were also never united in their history but the United States is today thinking what benefit is Somalia for the U.S? If they become independent then the South will be in chaos. The way they are thinking is that if democracy can be promoted like the way in Somaliland, then maybe this can influence the southern regions.The_Emperior5 wrote:
Well thats the idea of Ina ismacil samatar even if he tries to sell that to the top united state officials , it's still far from the reality , Somalilands government is not something the United states created Like the TFG,, or something like that , its something we have created ourselves. The US and the western world does not really care if Somaliland is recognized or not if it's recognized by the african union they will recognize it.
You are Right ruralman on one thing but if Somaliland is fully recognized that will mean the south will find peace America does not want that even the status Quo is great for Ethiopia , 3 Strong Somali countries is no good for Kenya Ethiopia So America will keep Somaliland as a friend not recognized , Keep the TFG as their friend even though they know TFG can't beat Shabaab. The west does not support Democracy that's what they want you to believe why do they all support the african dictators if they love democracy.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 791 Views
-
Last post by SLJOOFAY
-
- 42 Replies
- 4601 Views
-
Last post by Cirwaaq
-
- 30 Replies
- 2105 Views
-
Last post by damu
-
- 10 Replies
- 1540 Views
-
Last post by Babygirl-
-
- 15 Replies
- 1742 Views
-
Last post by Eaglehawk
-
- 2 Replies
- 1138 Views
-
Last post by Rambie
-
- 12 Replies
- 1037 Views
-
Last post by LobsterUnit
-
- 1 Replies
- 521 Views
-
Last post by LeJusticier
-
- 6 Replies
- 1526 Views
-
Last post by Rambie
-
- 4 Replies
- 996 Views
-
Last post by cyanide